How to Instruct a Family Court Accountant

Instructing a family court accountant follows FPR Part 25 in family proceedings (or CPR Part 35 in TOLATA). This page sets out seven steps for solicitors and a parallel seven-step path for individuals. See how it works for the full process, qualifications for credential checks, and contact us for indicative costs.

Section 1: for solicitors and barristers

1. Step 1: Identify proceedings type

   Confirm whether the case is financial remedy, Schedule 1 Children Act, TOLATA (CPR Part 35), or nuptial agreement analysis. Scope and procedural rules differ. See our proceedings pages for context.

2. Step 2: Decide SJE or party-appointed

   In most financial remedy cases, propose a Single Joint Expert. Party-appointed experts may be justified in high-value or highly contested matters. Agree with the other side where possible before applying to court.

3. Step 3: Apply for court permission where required

   File an FPR Part 25 application setting out why expert evidence is necessary, why the named expert is suitable, proposed questions, and cost estimate. Obtain permission before work starts unless directions already allow it.

4. Step 4: Prepare the letter of instruction

   For SJE appointments, both solicitors sign a joint letter defining proceedings, parties, questions, assumptions, documents provided, fee cap, and timetable. Vague questions produce vague reports.

5. Step 5: Provide financial documents

   Supply Form E and exhibits, company accounts, tax returns, bank statements, shareholding documents, and trust deeds. Flag any gaps so the expert can state limitations in the report.

6. Step 6: Expert delivers report within timetable

   The expert confirms conflicts, accepts instructions, and delivers the FPR Part 25 compliant report by the court-directed date. Draft discussion may occur where agreed in the letter.

7. Step 7: Written questions and hearing attendance

   Parties may put written questions under FPR Part 25. The expert answers within the permitted period and attends FDR or final hearing for oral evidence if directed.

Section 2: for individuals going through divorce

If you are going through divorce and want to understand how a family court accountant can help, here is what happens from your perspective. You need a solicitor to run proceedings; the accountant provides independent financial evidence your solicitor uses on your behalf.

1. Step 1: Talk to your family law solicitor

   A family court accountant works alongside your solicitor, not instead of them. Your solicitor instructs the expert, manages court applications, and uses the report in negotiation or hearings.

2. Step 2: Explain what concerns you

   Tell your solicitor if your spouse owns a business, declared income seems too low for your lifestyle, assets may be hidden, or Form E figures do not match what you know about family finances.

3. Step 3: Gather documents you already have

   Bank statements, old tax returns, records of major purchases, property details, and names of accountants or advisers your spouse used help your solicitor and the expert focus the investigation.

4. Step 4: Your solicitor requests expert evidence

   If accountant evidence is needed, your solicitor will usually propose a Single Joint Expert shared with your spouse, subject to court approval. You do not choose or pay the expert alone in most cases.

5. Step 5: Both sides provide disclosure

   Form E, business accounts, and bank statements are exchanged. The expert reviews what both parties supply. Incomplete disclosure from either side limits what can be concluded.

6. Step 6: Wait for the expert report

   Analysis typically takes several weeks. The report sets out value, lifestyle gaps, add-backs, or other findings in plain language. Your solicitor explains what it means for your case.

7. Step 7: Use the report in negotiation or court

   Figures from the report support settlement discussions, questionnaire requests, and court hearings. Written questions may follow if either side needs clarification before FDR or trial.

Red flags when instructing

• Instructing before court permission where FPR Part 25 requires it
• Joint letter with unfocused or argumentative questions
• Withholding documents from the expert while expecting firm conclusions
• Selecting an expert with no family court or matrimonial valuation experience
• Scope creep without amended instructions or fee agreement
• Informal pressure on the expert during without-prejudice negotiations

Ready to instruct? Submit your case details or read our FPR Part 25 guide for appointment detail.